I wasn't going to write about any of the events that have been going on in Europe and elsewhere, but people have been asking me about it nonstop. I think this may be because I am the only Muslim they know, but I also hope it's because they know I have some insight on world events. I've answered questions a couple of times this week and I may as well weigh in on this most public of forums, and I may as well discuss a couple of other topics as well.
On the subject of the cartoons published in the Danish newspaper, I have to say it's proof of the existence of chaos. Unlike the furor over the Satanic Verses, this is not a case where a work of fiction is being misread, or not read at all. The cartoons are fairly clear in their sentiment, and have been published in a wide variety of publications. I myself looked them up on the net once it became clear that this would be the new casus belli for some elements in both the East and the West. I have to say I was a somewhat impressed with the art style of the most prominent of the images (the one with the Prophet Mohammed's turban turning into a bomb). It was done in a style reminiscent of Persian art from around the 15th century - really beautiful, but ultimately heavy handed.
The issue of course is that the cartoons do not fictionalize or try to suppose a fictitious version of the past. They instead depict the Prophet of a major faith as a figure of violence. The violence that is depited is also somewhat indiscriminate - after all bombs don't choose who they kill. Whatever the actions of the religion's adherents (and I think most of us can agree that they are as representative of the faith as a whole as the Branch Davidians were of Protestant Christianity), it is hardly fair or accurate rather to paint not just the faith itself but the founder of said faith in that way. Once again, the analogies are not hard to find: despite the actions of Crusaders, the Inquisition or the townsfolk of Salem, it would be incorrect to say that Jesus was bloodthirsty. Or at least it would be on fairly shakey ground. The situation is exacerbated, of course, when the cartoons are introduced into the world in its current state, and the consequences are easily seen. Furthermore there is the matter of the lack of full understanding of Islam that one finds in the West as evinced in statments like the one from the Danish newspaper in question, whose editor said that they had printed cartoons of the Pope and others, as if these figures are equivalent to the Prophet.
Having said that, the reaction in the Muslim world has been less than rational and a little embarassing. Protests I can imagine, though the actions of the mobs in Egypt, Syria, Afghanistan and other places are simply shameful. It should be understood that there is a barely contained rage in the populations of these countries and indeed the entire Muslim world, due to poverty, governmental repression and the general disappointment with the status of Muslims in the world today (real or imagined, since after all perception is reality). In an environment like that it is easy to unleash that rage and then the behavior of the mob cannot be controlled. One need only look at Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds [Mckay] or The Great Cat Massacre [Darnton] to see the effects of the mob. Though initially prompted by the publication of the cartoons, this reaction was provoked further by the distribution by the so-called leaders of the Danish Muslim community of the cartoons from the paper itself and other cartoons that never made it to the printed page to the Egyptian media. While this act in itself may have been performed in good faith, its results were undeniably pernicious. A representative of that community subsequently refused to take any responsibility for the violence that had ensued, which makes him a hypocrite as well as a fool.
This of course doesn't absolve the other newspapers throughout the Continent that persisted in publishing and republishing the cartoons, ostensibly in defense of free speech. I fully support free speech, but I should point out that freedom is not simply an excuse to do whatever one wants. There is certain amount in circumspection that must be shown. Once the cartoons are published, discussing them and their impact is one thing, republishing them in an atmosphere that is already tense is as irresponsible as the leaders of the Muslim community in Denmark sending out pamphlets inciting their coreligionists to violence and then washing their hands of the whole thing. There's no real surprise there, unless one is hopelessly naive. The other issue is the insistence of hiding behind "free speech" when one is printing incendiary material. While I am no conspriacy theorist, I do know that Europe still harbors bad memories of it's history with Islam. For example, in justifying their crackdown on Chechnya, the Russians have on occasion claimed that Europe should be grateful that they, the Russians, had been holding the Muslim hordres at bay for so many centuries. A more obvious example is the one of the Balkans where a battle 500 years past was used as a justification for the invasion of Bosnia-Herzegovina and the despicable treatment of its inhabitants.
So there's blame all around: Muslim leaders, the Western Media and of course all of us who sit complicitly silent allowing ourselves to be cowed into silence whether with the threat of being branded as heretics or defilers of the temple of free speech. The situation will, like most wildfires, take a long time to bring back into hand; the people returned to their homes, the press with a sense of a real mission, and perspective to all the concerned parties.